Chang and Eng, by Darin Strauss

Yesterday I told my friend Tessa that life is too short to read anything you don’t thoroughly enjoy. Then I went back to slogging my way through this book, which I have been failing to enjoy lo these many months.

Sometimes I’m just sure I’m going to love a book, either because I’ve heard good things about it or, as in this case, I have really liked other books by the same author. But of course tastes vary, and liking an author doesn’t mean liking all of his work. Still, this was so hard to give up on! The premise is pretty fascinating; it’s the fictional memoir of one of the original Siamese twins. The writing is good, the story is promising, but I just didn’t like it.

Chang, the narrator, is a complete misanthrope. And the person he dislikes the most? His conjoined twin, Eng. I can relate to his desire to be alone; I am pretty reclusive myself. His total disconnection from every other human being, however, became oppressive. That and his sense of utter superiority. Could one really spend every single moment inches away from another human and feel nothing but contempt for him? This seems unlikely to me. If true, I can  not bear to read about, and would much prefer sweep it under the rug of ignorance.

As long as I’m complaining, I will note one other problem I had with this book. The twins were connected by some sort of ligament, referred to here as a band. Although many other details of scenery and physical countenance in the novel conjured up vivid images, I just can’t manage to picture this bond. Or band. Or ligament. Or… something. Google returns nothing useful; there were a few pictures taken of the twins, but none that show how they were attached. The band is mentioned often, and this lack of a visual representation drove me crazy.

I loved Darin Strauss’ memoir, Half a Life, and look forward to reading his other books. And I’m glad I didn’t spend another minute trying to like this one. Life is, after all, too short to spend reading anything you don’t thoroughly enjoy.

November

November has caught me reading several books at a time, which is always tricky – once I divert my attention it’s hard to say whether it will ever return. 


I started An Arsonist’s Guide to Writers’ Homes in New England: A Novel, by Brock Clark, but only got through about half. The tone charmed me at first, but soon grated. He’s sort of a modern-day Vonnegut, and his novel would benefit from Vonnegut-like brevity. 


I’m mid-way through Chang and Eng, by Darin Strauss, which I’m enjoying but seem to have put down for a little while. More about that one in the future.



We the Animals, by Justin Torres, is a first novel and a truly wonderful book, which always bodes well for the future. It’s very short, which lets you gulp it down in a sitting or two; just the way it should be experienced. This story of the youngest of three bear-cub brothers and their very young parents is emotionally charged, to say the least. It’s one of those very visceral novels, with no real dialogue, and a compelling immediacy. Highly recommended. It really deserves a post of its own, but may not get one.


I read two kid’s books this month:


The Liberation of Gabriel King, by K.L. Going, is a good story, well-told, about a fearful boy and his best friend in the just-starting-to-segregate South of the 60′s. 

I Am the Ice Worm, by Maryann Easly was so-so; interestingly set in the Arctic, but spotty in terms of plot and character. My book-obsessed 10-year-old liked it.

Now we’re into December, and I’m reading yet another great book. Stay tuned… 

The Shadow of the Wind, by Carlos Luis Zafon

This book was a little too melodramatic for me. I was initially charmed by the setting, and was prepared to wander down the alleys and sit in the cafes of Barcelona along with the protagonist. But then there was the part about him falling in love with the truly awful-sounding novel. And maybe adolescent boys in Spain, during Franco’s rule, were very different from adolescent boys in the United States, in the 21st century, but this kid seemed way too self-possessed and self-reflective to be true. I was completely on board for the more fantastical magical stuff, but honestly there was very little else that seemed remotely plausible. A quarter of the way into it, I was wondering how soon I’d be done. So I stopped.

Fierce Invalids Home From Hot Climates, by Tom Robbins

I’ve always had a soft spot for Tom Robbins, and I was pretty interested in what might happen to the main character. But God help me, I couldn’t sit through 415 pages of tangential rantings on the part of an egomaniacal CIA agent who has an inappropriate relationship with his 16 year old stepsister. Actually, it was the underage stepsister that really got me; a 32 year old white guy who thinks he knows more than anybody else is something for which I’ve kind of built up a tolerance.

Elizabeth Costello, by J. M. Coetzee

I slogged through about 50 pages of this book before throwing in the towel. I kept hoping that the story would take center stage, and the long musings on literary theory would come to an end. Alas, this is a book about a writer’s writing, more than about a writer’s life. Turns out I’m not all that interested in the study of literature, I just like reading it.

The Book Thief, by Markus Zusak

This is the second book this month that I’ve read quite a bit of, liked a lot, and then put down. In this case, I just couldn’t face the whole Jewish child during WWII thing. It is so well conceived and written that I expect to return to it at some point – maybe on a Mexican beach when I am far from my own life. Not a good pick for a particularly busy and illness-filled February.